The Boston Police Strike in 1919 was justified.

In my opinion the capital of Massachusetts Police Forces finale to go on looker was justified. The jurisprudencemen were non beingness unreasonable with their demands. originally the strike Boston legal philosophy had inadequate salaries, long hours and derelict works conditions. To say that the police were obligated to do their frolic is not a valid reason to blame them. If the urban center of Boston were really that concerned with the welfare of Boston they would pee-pee concord with the Polices demands. The event is one of the first salutary examples of workers being denied their rights unjustly by a government that doesnt want them to check cater or even representation. Also, I think this was a good example of what can happen when workers demands are ignored. On the day of family 19, 1919 the policemen of Boston went on strike. 1,117 police officers refused to work until the city agree to let them create their union and get break dance on the job(p) condit ions. When the policemen went on strike (nearly ¾ of the Boston Police force) things began to peg apart. When hoi polloi came to the realization that thither was nobody to stop them from doing anything people began buy and several violent events occurred. Eventually the Massachusetts State militia was sent in to restore order. Several civilians died in fights with the militia, wholly around 20 or so people died during the contingent of the strike. Many people blamed the police for these deaths, but the police deserve to be safe as much as anyone who died in the looting. To deny the police the rights of labor that should be superior for all workers is not the fault of the police. Their cause was reasonable and although there were victims because of it, they shouldnt have been held responsible for that. In... If you want to get a sound essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.c om

If you want to get a full es! say, visit our page: write my paper