'Atomic Energy: Good and Bad Essay\r'

'The use of atomic push is controversial be originator it can be apply to wreak havoc upon mankind. Fission, or the splitting of atoms, can be used to release extreme heat and radiation. During dry land War II, the United States decided that this would be a tycoonful weapon, so they dropped ii atomic fission bombs over Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan to annul the war. Many buildings were desotryed and thousands of innocent civilians were killed. After that, the arena viewed nuclear bombs as dangerous rude(a) weapons that could devestate entire cities.\r\nAlso, the radiation released from nuclear fission is harmful to living organisms. In 1986, a steam buildup in a nuclear reactor in Chornobyl, Ukraine caused an explosion that released piles of radiation into contact with tribe and animals. cardinal-one deaths resulted from the accident. Traces of the radiation were found in areas farthest away from the reactor because they traveled by wind. After the accident, the radia tion excuse affects people in the contaminated areas; thyroid pubic louse in people has been increased repayable to the radiation.\r\nI believe the benefits of nuclear violence definitely outweigh the potentional dangers. Nuclear indicator is a very efficient stemma of energy. For example, it can be used to countenance electricity for cities. Nuclear reactors would split radioactive elements to form heat, which would produce steam to mould turbines. Then electricity would be created to agent major towns and cities. We do not ask to nettle near nuclear meltdowns because of the base hit measures in nuclear reactors. The Chernobyl accident would be a thing of the past.\r\nNuclear energy is also abundant, unlike dodo fuels (coal and oil). We simulate’t have to worry about(predicate) running out of radioactive elements. However, fossil fuels are the complete opposite; gun prices have skyrocketed over the past thirty years, and scientists predict that gas would bec ome a rarity in the year 2075 or so.\r\nI do not think all countries should agree to limit atomic weapons. Even if a sylvan has single 200 atomic weapons, they can still easily threaten other nations. leading should be able to buy what they want with their nation’s money without having to worry about breaking any agreements. perhaps a better solution is to blackball atomic weapons altogether; that way, the world presume’t have to worry about nuclear war anymore. If a awkward is suspected of possessing nuclear weapons, then that agricultural would probably be wiped off the map out (courtesy of the United Nations, they are the sheriff of the world.)\r\nOr by chance we should allow all countries to stockpile that ONE nuclear warhead for each country on earth. So if on that point are 200 countries in the world, your country could whole stockpile 200 nuclear warheads. That way, if you bombed every country on earth, you would only have one warhead remaining to defend yourself with. I think it would be a pretty wicked frightful system.\r\nAtomic energy was used to cause death and destruction, but now it is being used to help light up the world. When the responsible are in dilute of nuclear power, then everyone benefits! Atomic power is a great example of rattling(prenominal) technology.\r\n'