My Friend Hamilton -Who I shot Essay -- essays research papers fc

A Historiographical word of honor of the Duel Between Aaron remove and The affaire dhonneur between Aaron burr and horse parsley Hamilton holds a significant relevance in American history and should be dated within the context of early American culture and politics. The recent historiography of the hazard provides us with a complex, evolving web of unconnected interpretations. Since the day of this tragic duel, multiplication and historians have puzzled over why these two prominent American statesmen confronted each other on the Plains of Weehawken. What wad or terminations could have move two of the more or less brilliant governmental minds in America to bilk their lives and reputations by taking aim at each other on that dismal day? The recent historiography of the event can be separate into two schools which I shall denote as the contextual school and the psycho-historical school. These differing schools try the complexity of history and the ex cristalt to which a v ariety of factors, including bias and ever-changing frames of reference can influence interpretative study and conclusions. It is the object of this discussion, therefore, to examine the heretofore mentioned interpretations, and to critically analyze the differing ideas concerning the Burr-Hamilton duel. The most succinct version of the event, as told by Joseph J. Ellis reads On the morning of July 11, 1804, Aaron Burr and Alexander Hamilton were rowed across the Hudson River in separate boats to a secluded office near Weehawken, cutting Jersey. There, in accord with the customs of the code duello, they interchange pistol shots at ten paces. Hamilton was struck on his right perspective and died the following day. Though unhurt, Burr found that his reputation suffered an equally mordant wound. In this, the most far-famed duel in American history, both(prenominal) participants were casualties.1 Almost every American is familiar with this most famousand injuriousof American du els. Hamilton was celebrated and hailed as a martyr, and Burr was labeled a murderer and went on to begin many strange adventures in the American west, eventually tried for imposture for his purported conspiratorial intentions. Before engaging advertize in this discussion, one must(prenominal) first differentiate between what I have denoted as contextual history and psycho-historical history. I contend that contextual ... ...no. 1 (1995) 1-23. Schachner, Nathan. Aaron Burr A Biography. New York, NY A.S. & Barnes Company, 1961. Shalhope, Robert E. Review of Affairs of delight in National Politics in the New Republic, by Joanne B. Freeman. The Journal of American History 89, no. 2 (2002) 620-621. Schneidman, J. Lee and Conalee Levin-Schneidman. Suicide or mutilate? The Burr-Hamilton Duel. Journal of Psychohistory 8, no. 2 (1980) 159-181. Stevens, William Oliver. Pistols at Ten Paces The Story of the rule of purity in America. Boston, MA Houghton Mifflin Company, 1940. Ward, A llen Mason. A History of the Roman People. quaternary Ed. Upper Saddle River, NY apprentice Hall, 2003. Weiten, Wayne. Psychology Themes and Variations. 5th Ed. Belmont, CA Wadsworth, 2001. Wood, Gordon S. The Radicalism of the American Revolution. New York, NY Vintage Books, 1991. Wyatt-Brown, Bertram. Confederate Honor Ethics and Behavior in the Old South. New York, NY Oxford University Press, 1982. ----------. Honor and Violence in the Old South. New York, NY Oxford University Press, 1986. Zinn, Howard. A Peoples History of the United States 1492-Present. New York, NY HarperCollins, 1980. My whiz Hamilton -Who I shot Essay -- essays research papers fcA Historiographical Discussion of the Duel Between Aaron Burr and The duel between Aaron Burr and Alexander Hamilton holds a significant relevance in American history and should be examined within the context of early American culture and politics. The recent historiography of the incident provides us with a com plex, evolving web of conflicting interpretations. Since the day of this tragic duel, contemporaries and historians have puzzled over why these two prominent American statesmen confronted each other on the Plains of Weehawken. What circumstances or events could have motivated two of the most brilliant political minds in America to endanger their lives and reputations by taking aim at each other on that dismal day? The recent historiography of the event can be divided into two schools which I shall denote as the contextual school and the psycho-historical school. These differing schools demonstrate the complexity of history and the extent to which a variety of factors, including bias and changing frames of reference can influence interpretive study and conclusions. It is the object of this discussion, therefore, to examine the heretofore mentioned interpretations, and to critically analyze the differing ideas concerning the Burr-Hamilton duel. The most succinct version of the event, as told by Joseph J. Ellis reads On the morning of July 11, 1804, Aaron Burr and Alexander Hamilton were rowed across the Hudson River in separate boats to a secluded spot near Weehawken, New Jersey. There, in accord with the customs of the code duello, they exchanged pistol shots at ten paces. Hamilton was struck on his right side and died the following day. Though unhurt, Burr found that his reputation suffered an equally fatal wound. In this, the most famous duel in American history, both participants were casualties.1 Almost every American is familiar with this most famousand deadlyof American duels. Hamilton was celebrated and hailed as a martyr, and Burr was labeled a murderer and went on to undertake many strange adventures in the American west, eventually tried for treason for his purported conspiratorial intentions. Before engaging further in this discussion, one must first differentiate between what I have denoted as contextual history and psycho-historical history. I cont end that contextual ... ...no. 1 (1995) 1-23. Schachner, Nathan. Aaron Burr A Biography. New York, NY A.S. & Barnes Company, 1961. Shalhope, Robert E. Review of Affairs of Honor National Politics in the New Republic, by Joanne B. Freeman. The Journal of American History 89, no. 2 (2002) 620-621. Schneidman, J. Lee and Conalee Levin-Schneidman. Suicide or Murder? The Burr-Hamilton Duel. Journal of Psychohistory 8, no. 2 (1980) 159-181. Stevens, William Oliver. Pistols at Ten Paces The Story of the Code of Honor in America. Boston, MA Houghton Mifflin Company, 1940. Ward, Allen Mason. A History of the Roman People. 4th Ed. Upper Saddle River, NY Prentice Hall, 2003. Weiten, Wayne. Psychology Themes and Variations. 5th Ed. Belmont, CA Wadsworth, 2001. Wood, Gordon S. The Radicalism of the American Revolution. New York, NY Vintage Books, 1991. Wyatt-Brown, Bertram. Southern Honor Ethics and Behavior in the Old South. New York, NY Oxford University Press, 1982. ----------. Honor and Vio lence in the Old South. New York, NY Oxford University Press, 1986. Zinn, Howard. A Peoples History of the United States 1492-Present. New York, NY HarperCollins, 1980.