The Coal Miners in France During the Second Empire Essay -- World Hist

The Coal Miners in France During the Second Empire In this idea I depart explain why revolt by the tire against capitalin Second Empire France failed. To explain the situation, I will useMarxs theory of capital accumulation as he presents it in Capital. Alsoimportant in the theoretical description of this phenomena is the office oftradition and the way its restraints deviate from those of the rescue inthis French society. found on this description I will discuss how thefunction of counsel is enforced by the economy and traditions inherentin a society. From these considerations I will suggest additional elementsand relationships necessary for social relations transfigure to transcend theinstitutional conditions in which they exist. Terminology relevent to a theoretical cast of an event is given byTalcott Parsons in The Structure of Social bodily function. Here, action isdescribed as a system that may be divided into unit acts. The unit actconsists of four element s. First on that point is an agent, or histrion. Second, theact has an end which is a future state of affairs or goal towards which theaction is oriented. Third, there is a situation where the trends ofdevelop- ment protest from the end towards which the action is oriented. Thesituation is composed of two elements the conditions are that which theactor cannot manipulate in accordance with his end, and the means are thatover which he does not have control. Finally there is a relation amidthese elements where a situation allows alterna- tive means to the end,the course is selected from the prescriptive orientation of the actor.(Parsons, 1968 44) In order to account for the interrelationships in the historical event... ... change. Events will later on no longer happen but attain meaning in the light of the sourcethat the charismatic element advocates. This change in normativeorientations relative to the change in other elements of the process mustbe reflected in the ideolog y. The ideology of social change may not justbe a reiffication of the old in a reactionary form. The warmheartedness of theideology, in being a response to the divergence caused by the economy andpolity, must be such as to transcend that which came before it. This utmostcondition, specifying the relations between elements necessary forrevolutionary change, may only be derived in a society which is neither anorganic, composite whole nor one of random atomistic ends. Rather, thesociety must be one where the normative orientation for mediating betweenconditions and means is one of consensus.